Our congratulations to both of them.
Regalado and Robaina are strong supporters (as were their opponents) of current U.S. policy towards Cuba, which conditions the lifting of trade and travel sanctions to democratic reforms and the respect for human rights by the Castro regime.
Yet, ironically, Time decided to publish a tangential article today, "Cuban-Americans' Change of View Means U.S. Travel Ban Could End," with the usual dicta regarding a generational shift, citing push polls, etc. The same arguments that have been regurgitated by the media and biased pundits since the "Mariel generation" of the 1980's.
The article brilliantly concludes that, "the Cuban-American delegation in Congress remains unmoved," regarding these "changing views."
Here's a novel concept: Maybe that's because it doesn't reflect the views of their electorate.
So at what point does the lack of any tangible data put this convenient theory -- for opponents of current U.S. policy -- beyond the laugh test?
