Next time the Brookings Institution, the Atlantic Council and the Center for Strategic and International Studies host one of their one-sided panels lobbying for a change in U.S. policy; release one of their push-polls; or issue one of their reports regurgitating the Castro regime's "statistics" -- simply ask yourself:
Where is their funding coming from?
Who are the interests behind these?
Why the lack of transparency?
The New York Times had a great report this weekend on how these institutions have lost their intellectual independence -- and hence, their credibility.
Frankly, these entities should be required to register as lobbyists.
From The New York Times:
More than a dozen prominent Washington research groups have received tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments in recent years while pushing United States government officials to adopt policies that often reflect the donors’ priorities, an investigation by The New York Times has found.
The money is increasingly transforming the once-staid think-tank world into a muscular arm of foreign governments’ lobbying in Washington. And it has set off troubling questions about intellectual freedom: Some scholars say they have been pressured to reach conclusions friendly to the government financing the research.
The think tanks do not disclose the terms of the agreements they have reached with foreign governments. And they have not registered with the United States government as representatives of the donor countries, an omission that appears, in some cases, to be a violation of federal law, according to several legal specialists who examined the agreements at the request of The Times.
As a result, policy makers who rely on think tanks are often unaware of the role of foreign governments in funding the research.
The arrangements involve Washington’s most influential think tanks, including the Brookings Institution, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Atlantic Council. Each is a major recipient of overseas funds, producing policy papers, hosting forums and organizing private briefings for senior United States government officials that typically align with the foreign governments’ agendas.
Foreign officials describe these relationships as pivotal to winning influence on the cluttered Washington stage, where hundreds of nations jockey for attention from the United States government. The arrangements vary: Some countries work directly with think tanks, drawing contracts that define the scope and direction of research. Others donate money to the think tanks, and then pay teams of lobbyists and public relations consultants to push the think tanks to promote the country’s agenda.
- ► 2016 (646)
- ► 2015 (1080)
09/07 - 09/14
- Obama Must Defend the Summit's "Democracy Clause"
- Tweet(s) of the Day: U.N. Ambassador Samantha Powe...
- Colombia Does Venezuela's (Cuba's) Dirty Work
- Caught on Film: Cuban Coast Guard Repressing Rafte...
- You Can't "Save" the Summit Without Its "Democracy...
- Cuba Claims It Has a "Right" to Do Business With t...
- Interview With a Young (Former) Cuban State Securi...
- Cuba and North Korea Share More Than Arms Traffick...
- Tweet(s) of the Day: Threats by Cuban Regime Offic...
- On Cuba's "Black Market"
- Independent Journalist Arrested, Pressured to Leav...
- Why Cuba Targets American Universities
- Why Are There So Many Police Agents on Cuba's Beac...
- Cuban Law Student Remains Imprisoned, On Hunger St...
- Tweet of the Day: Cuba as a Counter-Intelligence T...
- Yoani: A Dissident and a Patriot
- The Washington "Think-Tank" Charade
- Brazil Pays Cuba Over $1 Billion for Human Traffic...
- Pope Francis' Message to Cubans
- U.N. Investigates Another Suspicious North Korea-C...
- Solidarity and Truth: On Religious Persecution in ...
- A Reminder of Cuba's Continued Tragedy
- ▼ 09/07 - 09/14 (22)
- ► 2013 (1251)
- ► 2012 (1158)
- ► 2011 (1031)
- ► 2010 (1042)
- ► 2009 (933)